Premium

A panel of Curators reads your body of work.

Submit a curated sequence of 3–20 images and your declared experience level. Within minutes, one or more LensWideOpen Curators — each with their own aesthetic voice — read the work, score it on Vision / Craft / Cohesion / Resonance, and write a multi-paragraph critique with concrete suggestions for what to try next. Money-back guarantee. Public or private, your call.

Create an account to startSign in

How it works

  1. 01Pick a tier

    Mini Read for a single Curator's read of 3–5 images. Panel Review for 3 Curators + synthesis on 5–10. Full Project for 5 Curators + synthesis on 12–20.

  2. 02Submit a sequence

    Pick the images in the order you want them read. Add an optional project statement. Curators read the sequence as a whole, not as ten standalone frames.

  3. 03Read your panel

    Each Curator writes a 400–800 word critique with structured strengths + what-to-try-next bullets and four 0–10 dimension scores. Panel/Full tiers add a cross-Curator synthesis. Public link + printable PDF on completion.

  4. 04Get ranked

    Public Panel and Full Project reviews enter the Body of Work leaderboard at the level the panel reads your work at — Beginner, Intermediate, Advanced, or Expert. Compete with peers at your level, not strangers across the whole skill range. Private reviews stay off the board.

Mini Read

3–5 images · 1 Curator (your pick) · 200–400 word read with scoring.

25 credits

Sign up to start

Panel Review

5–10 images · 3 Curators · per-Curator reads + cross-panel synthesis. Eligible for the Body of Work leaderboard.

100 credits

Sign up to start

Full Project

12–20 images · 5 Curators · the deepest read with full synthesis. Build a finished portfolio reviewed by a curated panel.

250 credits

Sign up to start

What you get

  • Distinct Curator voices

    Each Curator on the panel reads through their own aesthetic — sequencing, light, sequencing, gesture, color. Two equally-skilled Curators disagreeing is the point.

  • Body of Work Score

    Four 0–10 dimensions — Vision, Craft, Cohesion, Resonance — aggregated to a 0–100 overall. Scores are absolute so the same body of work earns the same number on every leaderboard.

  • Structured guidance

    Each critique includes 3–5 strengths and 3–5 concrete what-to-try-next bullets calibrated to your declared level — beginner to expert.

  • Public link + printable PDF

    Every finished review gets a shareable link with rich previews on X / LinkedIn / Threads / Facebook, plus a printable view you can save to PDF in two clicks.

  • Authenticated by LensWideOpen

    Every Curator card on your report closes with their signature and a LensWideOpen seal — a verifiable record of who wrote what, when.

  • Money-back guarantee

    Not happy with the read? Submit a refund request from your results page. An admin reviews; approved refunds return your credits and remove the review from public surfaces.

See it for real

Sample Curator Reviews on public-domain photography from the LOC FSA/OWI archive and Smithsonian Open Access — reference critiques to show how the engine reads a curated sequence.

How to read the scores:Curator Reviews use an absolute 0–100 rubric, not a curve. Most bodies of work land 55–75; 75+ is Expert. A 76 isn’t a B-minus — it’s an honest read against the rubric the Curators score against.

Real user reviews →

Ready to be read?

Create a free account and a Mini Read fits inside your starting credit allocation. Try it on three images today.

Create an account